Deputy Journalists Exposing Fake News and Bringing Independent News to The world.

Internet DeputyBuy One Jar of CBD Hemp Paste - My Nutra

 
Absolute Disdain!
Main Stream Leftist Loses Control at the Wrong Time!

Progressive journalist and talk radio host, Leslie Marshall of the Huffington Post, took a political stab at Vice President, Mike Pence on Twitter in response to a solemn condolence statement that he made to the British people.

The statement, which attacked Pence with the typical progressive rhetoric, was inappropriate as it was political debate and untimely in the immediate aftermath of the third terrorist attack in that area in as many months.

The Vice President’s tweet stated, “Our thoughts & prayers are w/ the victims, courageous first responders & all the people of London. As President Trump said: WE ARE WITH YOU.”

This heartfelt statement was met with immediate criticism by Leslie Marshall, who instead of joining Pence in consoling the terror-torn community, decided to attack him with a reply tweet “Of which nearly 20% are Muslim did you mean them too?”

 

London Bridge Under Attack!

Two Other Attacks Have Occured

Posted by Jake Fogg June 3, 2017 
 

In London, what appears to be series of terror attacks that resulted in multiple casualties, occurred on the London Bridge beginning at approximately 10:30pm.  Police have rushed to an incident after witnesses said a van drove into pedestrians, according to a news report by Reuters.

The London Bridge is completely closed according to one witness, a French banker living in the city, with “police cars going one way and ambulances going the other”.

British Police told the BBC that casualties have been identified after what may have been an attack by a van and stabbings.

The police rushed to the scene after witnesses told them a van ran over pedestrians Saturday night. A woman told Rueters she saw people that looked to have had their throats cut.

According to Police, armed officers were also dealing with an incident in the Borough Market area nearby.

A woman told the BBC News, that “A white van driver came speeding – probably about 50mph- veered off the road into the crowds of people who were walking along the pavement.”

Another witness told Reuters that she saw what she thought was three people with people with knife wounds that possibly included trauma to the throat as if they had been cut.

Several witnesses have reported hearing gunshots, but it is unclear, at this point from whom or where the gunshots originated.

A third incident which police are dealing was reported in the Vauxhall area at around midnight.

This attacks, which police are not yet reporting as a terrorist attack, comes only 12 days following the Manchester suicide bombing that killed 22 people at a concert and only 3 months after a terrorist ran pedestrians over on Westminster Bridge and stabbed and killed a police officer.

With the June 8 election only 5 days away, it is unclear if this attack with have an impact on the Conservative Party’s  lead in the polls.

 

 

Trump's Climate Decision Has Immediate Impact on Environment!
U.S. Political Climate Upset

June 2, 2017

By: Jake Fogg

Yesterday, much to the dismay of many high-ranking leftists, President Donald Trump announced that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord.  The accord, which is actually a treaty, but only called an “agreement”, was entered into against Constitutional requirements by former  President Barack Obama in 2015 with enforcement beginning  late last year.

 Shortly after the announcement, the governors of three states formed a union devoted to what the Paris Treaty was loosely alleged to accomplish, which was apparently the reduction of greenhouse gasses.

In addition to the governors’ “climate alliance”, several media sources, and government officials in the U.S. and even other countries  began reportring “news”  and emotion-filled comentary that showed one-sidedness in response to The President’s decision. None of these reports seemed to support the Trump agenda,  which is to benefit “ Americans first”.

While there was much disatisfaction expressed, very little was mentioned of actual  legalities of the issue to begin with including the hampered freedoms of U.S. citizens as wellthe fact that it was unconstitutional for the former president to enter into this treaty in the first place.

The three governors who committed to the so-called “climate alliance” were Jerry Brown of California, Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Jay Inslee of Washington state, according to the Time.com.   The small group of three claim that they are “committed to upholding the Paris Climate(Treaty) Agreement and taking aggressive action on climate change”.

In a press release, Governor Jerry Brown accused President Trump of being “AWOL on this profoundly human endeavor” and said that other states would “step up”. The California governor also called Trump’s decision an “insane move” and “deviant behavior from the highest office of the land”.

Brown failed to admit that the “behavior” of the Obama administration was also devious in that it intentionally sought to circumvent congress in the whole process. as he also omitted just how much of California tax payer money he would commit from his deeply-indebted state.

According to Rollcall.com, Andrew Cuomo also weighed in on the commitment to the Paris Treaty by saying that he would issue an executive order that supports the state’s commitment to environmental concerns.  He, like Brown forgot to mention just how much the tax payers of New York would be required to pay.

Yesterday, following the president’s speech, the Washington Post released an article claiming to “fact-check” the president’s comments during the speech.  However, the article written by Glenn Kessler and Michelle Ye Hee Lee, contained very little actual supporting data and mostly axiomatic statements thus furthering its overt commitment to supporting the anti-Trump narrative.

Another article released by the Washington post earlier today and written by John Wagner is an opinion piece under the heading “politics”.  The purpose of this article is to show that Trump only pulled out of Paris treaty to support his voter base by fulfilling his promise to them.  Wagner points out that Trump, “remains historically unpopular at this point in his presidency”, but fails to explain that the voter base support itself remains largely unchanged since his election.

Wagner also attempts to marginalize the base by pointing out only a certain segment of it, which could be stereotyped as “unintelligent”.  An example of this is evident when he writes, “Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris accord plays particularly well with rural backers who embraced his ‘America First’ mantra” and are wary of the impact of Obama-era deals cut with allies overseas.”

Other sources in the news were not as subtle, however.  In a show segment of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” commentator, Joe Scarborough became emotional over the news of the withdraw. After implying that White House advisor, Steve Bannon told the president to withdraw from the Paris treaty, he then made the statement ,”Trump doesn’t know anything”.

Following this, Scarborough went on an emotional rant, almost yelling, referencing “President Bannon” several times.  He also claimed that “President Bannon” was only obsessing with a “small subset of the population”, inaccurately referring to the Trump voter base, presumably. However, he referred to “President Bannon” instead of Trump, so many times that it was possible the Scarborough might have been confused from an audience perspective.

But not only is the media showing its disdain for Trump’s decision yesterday, several countries that are part of the agreement, are also unhappy with President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Treaty.

According to a report today by the BBC, German Chancellor, Angela Merkel said the move was “extremely regrettable” but nothing would stop the treaty from moving forward.  “We need the Paris agreement to protect all of creation,” she said.

The European Commission and the UN essentially stated that the “agreement” was unstoppable. Several other countries in the accord expressed dissatisfaction with the President’s decision. 

In this anti-Trump political climate, it is obvious that there is no support whatsoever for the president. However, regardless of media and outsider feedback, the president is doing exactly what an elected official is expected to do, support his constituents and carry out campaign promises. This idea is foreign to many in today’s political ranks and serves to promote a valuable lesson to those willing to learn from it. 

UK Teachers Demand to Teach Toddlers  “LGBT Lifestyles”

By: Jake Fogg

At a national conference in Cardiff, Wales, UK’s National Union of Teachers (NUT) voted for its members to teach LBGT lifestyles and issues to toddlers in preschools and nursery schools.

While this may be a surprise to many, this issue is not only in the UK, but also in other parts of Europe and in the United States that has been working its way to younger and younger minds.  

One example of this occurred in March of 2010 when the World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts held a no-adults-welcome panel at the United Nations in which Planned Parenthood handed out brochures titled “Healthy, Happy, and Hot”. 

According to the association, the publication was distributed to girls as young as 10 years of age.  It covered such topics as masturbation, casual sex, and even “talking dirty”.  In the U.S., the organization is called Girl Scouts of the USA and claimed no connection to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, where the panel took place.

National Union of Teachers (NUT) stated that transgender lifestyles and same-sex relationships should be ‘promoted’ to children as young as two to reduce hate crime. An excerpt from the NUT Conference Final Agenda confirmed the statement in the wording, “…including promotion of LBGT+ matters for all school from Nursery throughout all phases of state education;”

NUT teachers complain that there is a “lack of policies which promote LGBT issues within schools”.  The teachers  at the conference agree that this has a “significant negative impact on the well-being of students and teachers who are homosexual, bisexual, or transgender.”

Much of the NUT Final Agenda was dedicated to ensuring that teachers were not required to carry an exceeded workload and seemed to complain about academic requirements being too strenuous. Yet, the organization encouraged its teachers to do extra to ensure LGBT standards were carried out even though the government had not yet made the standards mandatory for primary-aged students. 

The conference made two points very clear.  

By: Jake Fogg 

"The Risk of terrorism is threatening us today in a way that is worse than it was on 9/11”, warned John Kelly, the head of DHS on Tuesday, April 18, 2017. This is a wake-up-call to all Americans and should serve as a lesson on the danger of exchanging national security for political ideology.

To demonstrate the severity his statement, Kelly stated that there are open terrorist investigations in all 50 states. He also said that in the last 12 months alone, there are 37 open investigations of homegrown terrorists.

Kelly made it clear that this country is vulnerable to attack at any time and that there is really nothing that could be done to stop it. “The threat is vast, unpredictable, and difficult to control”, said Kelly. This information is frightening, yet should come as no surprise. After all, America asked for it. Indeed, it could even be argued that maybe America wanted it!

"Open terrorist investigations in all 50 states…”

Of course, when it does happen, and it likely will, the questions posed will be, “Why did this happen?”, “How did this happen?”, “Who is to blame?” And ironically, the questions will be asked by the very people that ARE to blame!

The root cause, or the “how”, of our national security disaster is very simple. Unfortunately, however, the “why”, or list of reasons and contributors is long and complex.

There should be no question as to what caused our crippled state of national security. The United States decided to disregard its own borders, while simultaneously and voluntarily bringing in thousands of immigrants from cultures that are contradictive to a free society. We simply

More Articles ...