User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active
Comey Caught Lying!
 
USA Today Cover-up, NY Times, CNN Prove it! 

By: Jake Fogg

Fired FBI director James Comey testified before the Senate intelligence committee “under oath” Thursday June 8.  While the mainstream media is trying to have its witch hunt, two very important points will be largely glazed over.  

The first most obvious point is that Trump was not the subject of the so-called “Russian collusion” investigation, which the fired FBI director admitted.  However, this information pales comparison to the lie that Comey told to the Senate intelligent committee regarding the leaking of his personal memos to the press.

When questioned by Senator Susan Collins as to whether he had showed copies of his personal memos, he replied “Yes”.

When asked by Collins, who he shared the information with, Comey testified , “I woke up in the middle of the night on Monday (May 15th) night because it didn’t dawn on me that originally that there might be corroboration for our conversation. There might be a tape. My judgment was, I need to get that out into the public square. I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter.”

The timeline that Comey has testified to is erroneous.  According to him he never leaked anything until after May 15th.  However, a CNN story  on May 12th reported “A source close to Comey told CNN’s Jake Tapper Wednesday (May 10th) there are two specific reasons why Trump fired the FBI director:”

May 10th is actually prior to President Trump’s  May 12th tweet regarding “tapes”, which contradicts Comey’s story that he did leak in response to Trump’s tweet.

Another statement within the same CNN story also contradicts Comey’s leak date.  The Story reports, “Comey is ‘Not worried about any tapes’ of conversations between him and Trump, a source familiar with the matter told CNN on Friday (May 12th), adding that ‘if there is a tape, there’s nothing he is worried about’ that could be on it.”  

The question is if Comey was indeed worried about the potential of "tapes" to prompt him to leak, then why was he not concerned about them on May 12th, the date that cnn said the "sources familiar" said he was not worried about tapes?

It is not possible for there to have been a leaked statement on the same day of Trump’s “tape” tweet if Comey decided not to leak until he woke up in the middle of the night on May 15th as a result of the tweet, which he says is when he called his “friend”.

According to news reports on May 12th, NBC also quoted “unknown sources” close to Comey making the same claim that Comey “wasn’t worried” about tapes.

But CNN is not the only report that came out prior to the leak as asserted by Comey. In a press statement, President Trumps attorney, Marc Kasowitz, asserted that James Comey leaked privileged information to the press.  He also claimed that the New York times reported on the Comey’s memos before the “tapes” tweet was posted.

Trump Meeting Comey in New York Times Story May 11th

The USA Today alleged in an article posted on June 8th, that there was no evidence to support the attorny's claim regarding the New YorkTimes. However, the article by David Jackson, is wrong as the New York Times did post an article prior to Comey's alleged leak date. 

A New York Times  article on May 11th titled "In a Private Dinner, Trump Demanded Loyalty. Comey Demurred", is based on information from the leaked memos. This comes a full day ahead of President Trump's "tapes" tweet, thus discounting the claim that Comey leaked his memos after and in response to the tweet.

While there are questions as to whether James Comey should face penalties for leaking information, the future may also find charges of perjury.  After all, the former top law enforcement official did lie under oath, which is a very serious offence given the circumstances. 

Regardless of the future potential legal procedings in store, it is certain now, that President Donald Trump likely made a wise decision by terminating Comey's employment. His ability to lead an orgaization is now seriously hampered since his dishonesty has become evident. 

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
 

ISIS Attacks Tehran!

Iran Blames Sunni Saudi Arabia, But Sunni CAIR-Hamas and Shiite Hezbollah Are Both Connected to the State   

Iranian Parliament Building, the site of one of the Isis attacks.

By: Jake Fogg

Terrorists strikes terrorist state as Isis claims responsibility for the two attacks in Iran’s capital on June 7 which claimed lives.  Unconfirmed reports by Iran’s state-run news puts the body count at 12 not, including the 6 attackers, with several wounded.

One of the attacks occurred inside the parliament building where a session was in progress resulting in 11 deaths and a stand-off which lasted approximately 4 hours.

According to the AP, other attack symbolically took place at the tomb-shrine of the Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution that overthrew the shah.  

A New York Times article quotes Iran, stating that the attacks are linked to President Trump’s recent visit to the Middle East region which supposedly emboldened Saudi Arabia and other Sunni style Islamic regimes.  

The article states that according to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard and hard-line analyst, Hamidreza Targhi, Saudi Arabia and its allies’ ideology are more closely related to ISIS. Iran’s double-speak is obviously contrary to the purpose of Trump’s Middle East visit, which of course was to find ways to defeat  ISIS.

In a Reuters report, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard issued the statement, “This terrorist attack happened only a week after the meeting between the U.S. president and the (Saudi) backward leaders who support terrorists. The fact that Islamic State has claimed responsibility proves that they were involved in the brutal attack."

Although Saudi Arabia has denied any involvement in the attack, the accusation comes only days after Riyad and other Sunni allies cut relations with Qatar for its backing of Iran and other terrorist organizations.  

 However, it is much more likely that these rare attacks in Tehran result from a separate power-struggle between the terrorist sects, Islamic State (ISIS) and Iran who supports Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Council of American Islam Relations (CAIR).

According to deputy interior minister, Mohammad Hossein Zolfaghari, attackers dressed as women stormed through parliament’s main entrance in Tehran.  One of them detonated a suicide vest.

A journalist for state run media reported, “I was inside the parliament when the shooting happened.  Everyone was shocked and scared. I saw two men shooting randomly.”

The Islamic State’s Amaq statement comes as a surprise is it points out a subtle irony.  Although Isis is a Sunni faction and Iran is Shiite, Iran has contributed to both types of terrorism by contributing to the likes of CAIR-connected Hamas and Hezbollah.    

User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active
 
Absolute Disdain!
Main Stream Leftist Loses Control at the Wrong Time!

Progressive journalist and talk radio host, Leslie Marshall of the Huffington Post, took a political stab at Vice President, Mike Pence on Twitter in response to a solemn condolence statement that he made to the British people.

The statement, which attacked Pence with the typical progressive rhetoric, was inappropriate as it was political debate and untimely in the immediate aftermath of the third terrorist attack in that area in as many months.

The Vice President’s tweet stated, “Our thoughts & prayers are w/ the victims, courageous first responders & all the people of London. As President Trump said: WE ARE WITH YOU.”

This heartfelt statement was met with immediate criticism by Leslie Marshall, who instead of joining Pence in consoling the terror-torn community, decided to attack him with a reply tweet “Of which nearly 20% are Muslim did you mean them too?”

User Rating: 5 / 5

Star ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar ActiveStar Active
Absolute Disdain!
Main Stream Leftist Loses Control at the Wrong Time!

Progressive journalist and talk radio host, Leslie Marshall of the Huffington Post, took a political stab at Vice President, Mike Pence on Twitter in response to a solemn condolence statement that he made to the British people.

The statement, which attacked Pence with the typical progressive rhetoric, was inappropriate for political debate and untimely in the immediate aftermath of the third terrorist attack in that area in as many months.

The Vice President’s tweet stated, “Our thoughts & prayers are w/ the victims, courageous first responders & all the people of London. As President Trump said: WE ARE WITH YOU.”

This heartfelt statement was met with immediate criticism by Leslie Marshall, who instead of joining Pence in consoling the terror-torn community, decided to attack him with a reply tweet “Of which nearly 20% are Muslim did you mean them too?”

This type of response serves to solidify the well know idea that main stream media in not genuine in its support for those who are real people and real victims. Instead, as Marshall indicated, leftist journalists are more concerned about abstract victims that fall into the media narrative.

Although this has not been reported on any main stream media outlets, Leslie Marshall’s response caused many citizens on twitter to become outraged and responded to her with their own posts.

 

One twitter account, @Kyle Tsmart wrote “Trolling the VP at this time? Classy Another Twitter poster by the name of Dan Crispen posted “What’s gotten into you? Your response is shameful.”

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
 

London Bridge Under Attack!

Two Other Attacks Have Occured

Posted by Jake Fogg June 3, 2017 
 

In London, what appears to be series of terror attacks that resulted in multiple casualties, occurred on the London Bridge beginning at approximately 10:30pm.  Police have rushed to an incident after witnesses said a van drove into pedestrians, according to a news report by Reuters.

The London Bridge is completely closed according to one witness, a French banker living in the city, with “police cars going one way and ambulances going the other”.

British Police told the BBC that casualties have been identified after what may have been an attack by a van and stabbings.

The police rushed to the scene after witnesses told them a van ran over pedestrians Saturday night. A woman told Rueters she saw people that looked to have had their throats cut.

According to Police, armed officers were also dealing with an incident in the Borough Market area nearby.

A woman told the BBC News, that “A white van driver came speeding – probably about 50mph- veered off the road into the crowds of people who were walking along the pavement.”

Another witness told Reuters that she saw what she thought was three people with people with knife wounds that possibly included trauma to the throat as if they had been cut.

Several witnesses have reported hearing gunshots, but it is unclear, at this point from whom or where the gunshots originated.

A third incident which police are dealing was reported in the Vauxhall area at around midnight.

This attacks, which police are not yet reporting as a terrorist attack, comes only 12 days following the Manchester suicide bombing that killed 22 people at a concert and only 3 months after a terrorist ran pedestrians over on Westminster Bridge and stabbed and killed a police officer.

With the June 8 election only 5 days away, it is unclear if this attack with have an impact on the Conservative Party’s  lead in the polls.

 

 

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
Trump's Climate Decision Has Immediate Impact on Environment!
U.S. Political Climate Upset

June 2, 2017

By: Jake Fogg

Yesterday, much to the dismay of many high-ranking leftists, President Donald Trump announced that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord.  The accord, which is actually a treaty, but only called an “agreement”, was entered into against Constitutional requirements by former  President Barack Obama in 2015 with enforcement beginning  late last year.

 Shortly after the announcement, the governors of three states formed a union devoted to what the Paris Treaty was loosely alleged to accomplish, which was apparently the reduction of greenhouse gasses.

In addition to the governors’ “climate alliance”, several media sources, and government officials in the U.S. and even other countries  began reportring “news”  and emotion-filled comentary that showed one-sidedness in response to The President’s decision. None of these reports seemed to support the Trump agenda,  which is to benefit “ Americans first”.

While there was much disatisfaction expressed, very little was mentioned of actual  legalities of the issue to begin with including the hampered freedoms of U.S. citizens as wellthe fact that it was unconstitutional for the former president to enter into this treaty in the first place.

The three governors who committed to the so-called “climate alliance” were Jerry Brown of California, Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Jay Inslee of Washington state, according to the Time.com.   The small group of three claim that they are “committed to upholding the Paris Climate(Treaty) Agreement and taking aggressive action on climate change”.

In a press release, Governor Jerry Brown accused President Trump of being “AWOL on this profoundly human endeavor” and said that other states would “step up”. The California governor also called Trump’s decision an “insane move” and “deviant behavior from the highest office of the land”.

Brown failed to admit that the “behavior” of the Obama administration was also devious in that it intentionally sought to circumvent congress in the whole process. as he also omitted just how much of California tax payer money he would commit from his deeply-indebted state.

According to Rollcall.com, Andrew Cuomo also weighed in on the commitment to the Paris Treaty by saying that he would issue an executive order that supports the state’s commitment to environmental concerns.  He, like Brown forgot to mention just how much the tax payers of New York would be required to pay.

Yesterday, following the president’s speech, the Washington Post released an article claiming to “fact-check” the president’s comments during the speech.  However, the article written by Glenn Kessler and Michelle Ye Hee Lee, contained very little actual supporting data and mostly axiomatic statements thus furthering its overt commitment to supporting the anti-Trump narrative.

Another article released by the Washington post earlier today and written by John Wagner is an opinion piece under the heading “politics”.  The purpose of this article is to show that Trump only pulled out of Paris treaty to support his voter base by fulfilling his promise to them.  Wagner points out that Trump, “remains historically unpopular at this point in his presidency”, but fails to explain that the voter base support itself remains largely unchanged since his election.

Wagner also attempts to marginalize the base by pointing out only a certain segment of it, which could be stereotyped as “unintelligent”.  An example of this is evident when he writes, “Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris accord plays particularly well with rural backers who embraced his ‘America First’ mantra” and are wary of the impact of Obama-era deals cut with allies overseas.”

Other sources in the news were not as subtle, however.  In a show segment of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” commentator, Joe Scarborough became emotional over the news of the withdraw. After implying that White House advisor, Steve Bannon told the president to withdraw from the Paris treaty, he then made the statement ,”Trump doesn’t know anything”.

Following this, Scarborough went on an emotional rant, almost yelling, referencing “President Bannon” several times.  He also claimed that “President Bannon” was only obsessing with a “small subset of the population”, inaccurately referring to the Trump voter base, presumably. However, he referred to “President Bannon” instead of Trump, so many times that it was possible the Scarborough might have been confused from an audience perspective.

But not only is the media showing its disdain for Trump’s decision yesterday, several countries that are part of the agreement, are also unhappy with President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Treaty.

According to a report today by the BBC, German Chancellor, Angela Merkel said the move was “extremely regrettable” but nothing would stop the treaty from moving forward.  “We need the Paris agreement to protect all of creation,” she said.

The European Commission and the UN essentially stated that the “agreement” was unstoppable. Several other countries in the accord expressed dissatisfaction with the President’s decision. 

In this anti-Trump political climate, it is obvious that there is no support whatsoever for the president. However, regardless of media and outsider feedback, the president is doing exactly what an elected official is expected to do, support his constituents and carry out campaign promises. This idea is foreign to many in today’s political ranks and serves to promote a valuable lesson to those willing to learn from it. 

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
UK Teachers Demand to Teach Toddlers  “LGBT Lifestyles”

By: Jake Fogg

At a national conference in Cardiff, Wales, UK’s National Union of Teachers (NUT) voted for its members to teach LBGT lifestyles and issues to toddlers in preschools and nursery schools.

While this may be a surprise to many, this issue is not only in the UK, but also in other parts of Europe and in the United States that has been working its way to younger and younger minds.  

One example of this occurred in March of 2010 when the World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts held a no-adults-welcome panel at the United Nations in which Planned Parenthood handed out brochures titled “Healthy, Happy, and Hot”. 

According to the association, the publication was distributed to girls as young as 10 years of age.  It covered such topics as masturbation, casual sex, and even “talking dirty”.  In the U.S., the organization is called Girl Scouts of the USA and claimed no connection to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, where the panel took place.

National Union of Teachers (NUT) stated that transgender lifestyles and same-sex relationships should be ‘promoted’ to children as young as two to reduce hate crime. An excerpt from the NUT Conference Final Agenda confirmed the statement in the wording, “…including promotion of LBGT+ matters for all school from Nursery throughout all phases of state education;”

NUT teachers complain that there is a “lack of policies which promote LGBT issues within schools”.  The teachers  at the conference agree that this has a “significant negative impact on the well-being of students and teachers who are homosexual, bisexual, or transgender.”

Much of the NUT Final Agenda was dedicated to ensuring that teachers were not required to carry an exceeded workload and seemed to complain about academic requirements being too strenuous. Yet, the organization encouraged its teachers to do extra to ensure LGBT standards were carried out even though the government had not yet made the standards mandatory for primary-aged students. 

The conference made two points very clear.  

More Articles ...