Jake

Jake

Citizen Reporters Page
We Are Change's Channel Video of NYC Anti-Sharia Protest

 On Saturday, June 10, 2017, ACT for America staged , anti-    Sharia law rallies that took place in cities all over the United  States. 

 This video shows, once again, that the mainstream media  accounts of these protests are completely opposite the truth. 

 This particular Anti Sharia protest video shows independent  journalist Lauren Southern being harassed without provocation by  counter-protestors. The person filming was also harrassed. . 

 A worthy note on this as well is that there was no arguement or  dialogue provided by those who the media refers to as "tolerant".

Tuesday, 13 June 2017 18:43

Media Losing Immigration, Sharia...

Mainstream Media Losing Battle With Citizen Reporters
Antifa-Supported Media Loses Anti-Sharia Arguement Due to "Boots on the Ground"
 

By:Jake Fogg

 On Saturday, June 10, anti-Sharia law rallies  took place all over the United States.    Mainstream media sources such as the  Washington Post, LA Times, Huffington Post,  and many others mobilized to misreport the r  rallies as white supremacist “hate marches”. 

 However, the real reporting and video footage  came from many sources other than the  mainstream and they told a very different  story. 

 In response to the mainstream media bias,  micro reporters, citizens with smartphones and  cameras, all over the United States have taken news reporting into their own hands.  They are providing thousands of hours of live coverage, uploaded videos, witness accounts and even commentary of what many say the media simply refuse to cover anymore.

Today’s social media and access to public media such as You Tube has not only created rock stars and talk-show hosts.  It has also allowed for the average person with a smart phone to record real time incidents, thus circumventing the conventional means of news reporting that has become increasingly biased.

More recently there has been an insurgence of “micro-reporters” who have been recording and posting coverage of protests, riots, government waste, and fraud, that are either misrepresented or not covered at all by the media.

Facebook page, The Illusive Progress Movement,(IPM) is one example of micro-reporters documenting much more than the media.  Two of the main contributors to the page are a husband and wife couple by the name Yager.  The page is also linked to a web site with the same name that posts news and events. It also states that it is in the process of producing a documentary that exposes the lefts’ dismantling of America.

The Yagers, between the IPM page and their personal pages, have several posted videos, which they streamed live.  The videos contain raw footage of protests that in some cases have adversaries actually threatening violence and acting evasive.  The videos are not only film, but a complete account of what is happening as well as commentary. They are literally complete news reports.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VuxiFvo3y4w?ecver=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 One of the Yager videos was included in a You Tube montage of three videos documenting the reaction of illegal immigrants at a supposed town hall meeting. The meeting was organized by US Congressman, Lou Correa, as a workshop to show illegal immigrants how to circumvent a tightening immigration system since Donald Trump has taken office.

The meeting could not get underway and was eventually canceled due to Trump supporters who attempted to hold the congressman accountable, thus causing protest inside the building.  This fact was not documented by the Yagers who filmed outside, but appeared unable to enter, but by other citizens such as Arthur Christopher Shaper who posted to You Tube as well, thus providing thorough documentation of the entire event.

You Tube channels have videos posted from all over the country documenting Saturday’s anti-Sharia events and protests. There are several showing resistance by counter protestors holding hate flags of Che Guevara , Communist symbols, and dressed as Antifa in black reminiscent of “KKK” style  cover-up.

One channel, grindall61 not only films the protests in San Bernardino, CA, but also narrates what the protests are about, what is happening in the area, and peoples’ reactions from both sides.  Another video posted by “Trump Chronicles” monitors the protests in New York City. Yet another video documents a rally that took place in Seattle, WA. 

But these were only a few that are listed. There are many more on You Tube and even more on Facebook.  

It comes as no surprise that people will use technology that was formerly relegated to only news agencies.  However, it is likely that the mainstream media had not counted on it being used against them to do the job on a raw, not staged platform.  Inadvertently it has become a tool which has become a powerful force which could eventually push the mainstream media completely aside.

In the view of Interdeputy.com, micro-reporters , or those armed with a camera and courage, provide a much more valuable account of events than the mainstream media.  Managing editor, Jake Fogg, has decided to dedicate an entire link-tab to this type of footage and reporting. The tab will be called “Raw News”.

Thursday, 08 June 2017 23:02

Comey Leaked and Lied!

Comey Caught Lying!
 
USA Today Cover-up, NY Times, CNN Prove it! 

By: Jake Fogg

Fired FBI director James Comey testified before the Senate intelligence committee “under oath” Thursday June 8.  While the mainstream media is trying to have its witch hunt, two very important points will be largely glazed over.  

The first most obvious point is that Trump was not the subject of the so-called “Russian collusion” investigation, which the fired FBI director admitted.  However, this information pales comparison to the lie that Comey told to the Senate intelligent committee regarding the leaking of his personal memos to the press.

When questioned by Senator Susan Collins as to whether he had showed copies of his personal memos, he replied “Yes”.

When asked by Collins, who he shared the information with, Comey testified , “I woke up in the middle of the night on Monday (May 15th) night because it didn’t dawn on me that originally that there might be corroboration for our conversation. There might be a tape. My judgment was, I need to get that out into the public square. I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter.”

The timeline that Comey has testified to is erroneous.  According to him he never leaked anything until after May 15th.  However, a CNN story  on May 12th reported “A source close to Comey told CNN’s Jake Tapper Wednesday (May 10th) there are two specific reasons why Trump fired the FBI director:”

May 10th is actually prior to President Trump’s  May 12th tweet regarding “tapes”, which contradicts Comey’s story that he did leak in response to Trump’s tweet.

Another statement within the same CNN story also contradicts Comey’s leak date.  The Story reports, “Comey is ‘Not worried about any tapes’ of conversations between him and Trump, a source familiar with the matter told CNN on Friday (May 12th), adding that ‘if there is a tape, there’s nothing he is worried about’ that could be on it.”  

The question is if Comey was indeed worried about the potential of "tapes" to prompt him to leak, then why was he not concerned about them on May 12th, the date that cnn said the "sources familiar" said he was not worried about tapes?

It is not possible for there to have been a leaked statement on the same day of Trump’s “tape” tweet if Comey decided not to leak until he woke up in the middle of the night on May 15th as a result of the tweet, which he says is when he called his “friend”.

According to news reports on May 12th, NBC also quoted “unknown sources” close to Comey making the same claim that Comey “wasn’t worried” about tapes.

But CNN is not the only report that came out prior to the leak as asserted by Comey. In a press statement, President Trumps attorney, Marc Kasowitz, asserted that James Comey leaked privileged information to the press.  He also claimed that the New York times reported on the Comey’s memos before the “tapes” tweet was posted.

Trump Meeting Comey in New York Times Story May 11th

The USA Today alleged in an article posted on June 8th, that there was no evidence to support the attorny's claim regarding the New YorkTimes. However, the article by David Jackson, is wrong as the New York Times did post an article prior to Comey's alleged leak date. 

A New York Times  article on May 11th titled "In a Private Dinner, Trump Demanded Loyalty. Comey Demurred", is based on information from the leaked memos. This comes a full day ahead of President Trump's "tapes" tweet, thus discounting the claim that Comey leaked his memos after and in response to the tweet.

While there are questions as to whether James Comey should face penalties for leaking information, the future may also find charges of perjury.  After all, the former top law enforcement official did lie under oath, which is a very serious offence given the circumstances. 

Regardless of the future potential legal procedings in store, it is certain now, that President Donald Trump likely made a wise decision by terminating Comey's employment. His ability to lead an orgaization is now seriously hampered since his dishonesty has become evident. 

Wednesday, 07 June 2017 22:04

Isis Attacks Iran! Ironic!

 

ISIS Attacks Tehran!

Iran Blames Sunni Saudi Arabia, But Sunni CAIR-Hamas and Shiite Hezbollah Are Both Connected to the State   

Iranian Parliament Building, the site of one of the Isis attacks.

By: Jake Fogg

Terrorists strikes terrorist state as Isis claims responsibility for the two attacks in Iran’s capital on June 7 which claimed lives.  Unconfirmed reports by Iran’s state-run news puts the body count at 12 not, including the 6 attackers, with several wounded.

One of the attacks occurred inside the parliament building where a session was in progress resulting in 11 deaths and a stand-off which lasted approximately 4 hours.

According to the AP, other attack symbolically took place at the tomb-shrine of the Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of the revolution that overthrew the shah.  

A New York Times article quotes Iran, stating that the attacks are linked to President Trump’s recent visit to the Middle East region which supposedly emboldened Saudi Arabia and other Sunni style Islamic regimes.  

The article states that according to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard and hard-line analyst, Hamidreza Targhi, Saudi Arabia and its allies’ ideology are more closely related to ISIS. Iran’s double-speak is obviously contrary to the purpose of Trump’s Middle East visit, which of course was to find ways to defeat  ISIS.

In a Reuters report, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard issued the statement, “This terrorist attack happened only a week after the meeting between the U.S. president and the (Saudi) backward leaders who support terrorists. The fact that Islamic State has claimed responsibility proves that they were involved in the brutal attack."

Although Saudi Arabia has denied any involvement in the attack, the accusation comes only days after Riyad and other Sunni allies cut relations with Qatar for its backing of Iran and other terrorist organizations.  

 However, it is much more likely that these rare attacks in Tehran result from a separate power-struggle between the terrorist sects, Islamic State (ISIS) and Iran who supports Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and the Council of American Islam Relations (CAIR).

According to deputy interior minister, Mohammad Hossein Zolfaghari, attackers dressed as women stormed through parliament’s main entrance in Tehran.  One of them detonated a suicide vest.

A journalist for state run media reported, “I was inside the parliament when the shooting happened.  Everyone was shocked and scared. I saw two men shooting randomly.”

The Islamic State’s Amaq statement comes as a surprise is it points out a subtle irony.  Although Isis is a Sunni faction and Iran is Shiite, Iran has contributed to both types of terrorism by contributing to the likes of CAIR-connected Hamas and Hezbollah.    

Tuesday, 06 June 2017 19:04

D-Day Not Covered By Mainstream

 

D-Day Anniversary Not Covered By Mainstream Media

Not "Politically Correct" To Do So

Today is the 73rd anniversary of the D-Day invasion and, according to a Google search, no one in the mainstream media is reporting it. In the spirit of America hatred, the mainstream media seems to have completely forgotten about one of the largest scale invasions that the U.S. ever took part in, costing almost 2500 American lives.

Today is the anniversary of the D-Day. Allied forces planned and executed one of the largest invasions in history which played a major role in turning the tides against the Germans and ultimately lead to the defeat of Hitler.

It is difficult to say exactly why the mainstream media refuses to mention the anniversary.  It is possible, that indoctrination against America in the public school systems over the past 40 is part of the cause.  However in the “politically correct” climate of the mainstream media, it is likely that it is not fashionable for these media outlets to report anything that reminds the public of America’s real history. 

According to the mainstream media, having pride in the United States is apparently against the current narrative.  This was clearly demonstrated on MSNBC  on June 2, when Joe Scarborough of “Morning Joe” marginalized the Trump voter base as being a very small portion of the people overall.   Trump voters , or course, are known for their pride in America.

Scarborough was on a rant in opposition to Trump pulling out of the Paris Climate Treaty when he, without real evidence, made the claim that president advisor Steve Bannon was the person that actually made the decision to pull out. He was so upset that he began referring to Bannon as the president . But Scarborough didn’t start getting upset until he started describing the small sizeof Trump support base.  After that he said “President Bannon” so many times that many speculate that he actually temporarily forgot who the president really is.

While the media doesn’t say directly that American Pride is bad, it attacks and stereotypes those who support people and policies that show American pride. Essentially anyone who supports the Republican Party, Trump Supporters, Ted Cruz supporters, The Heritage Foundation, and similar organizations, are “de-facto racists, homophobes and bigots”.

While the mainstream media does indeed make it clear to Americans that it is against American exceptionalism, reporting on the D-Day invasion, that lost so many lives, would be more of a humanitarian endeavor by recognizing those who gave the ultimate sacrifice. But it would seem that Media pride is more important than paying respects to those who gave their life. 

Tuesday, 06 June 2017 00:11

Media Shows Hatred

 
Absolute Disdain!
Main Stream Leftist Loses Control at the Wrong Time!

Progressive journalist and talk radio host, Leslie Marshall of the Huffington Post, took a political stab at Vice President, Mike Pence on Twitter in response to a solemn condolence statement that he made to the British people.

The statement, which attacked Pence with the typical progressive rhetoric, was inappropriate as it was political debate and untimely in the immediate aftermath of the third terrorist attack in that area in as many months.

The Vice President’s tweet stated, “Our thoughts & prayers are w/ the victims, courageous first responders & all the people of London. As President Trump said: WE ARE WITH YOU.”

This heartfelt statement was met with immediate criticism by Leslie Marshall, who instead of joining Pence in consoling the terror-torn community, decided to attack him with a reply tweet “Of which nearly 20% are Muslim did you mean them too?”

Monday, 05 June 2017 23:25

Absolute Disdain!

Absolute Disdain!
Main Stream Leftist Loses Control at the Wrong Time!

Progressive journalist and talk radio host, Leslie Marshall of the Huffington Post, took a political stab at Vice President, Mike Pence on Twitter in response to a solemn condolence statement that he made to the British people.

The statement, which attacked Pence with the typical progressive rhetoric, was inappropriate for political debate and untimely in the immediate aftermath of the third terrorist attack in that area in as many months.

The Vice President’s tweet stated, “Our thoughts & prayers are w/ the victims, courageous first responders & all the people of London. As President Trump said: WE ARE WITH YOU.”

This heartfelt statement was met with immediate criticism by Leslie Marshall, who instead of joining Pence in consoling the terror-torn community, decided to attack him with a reply tweet “Of which nearly 20% are Muslim did you mean them too?”

This type of response serves to solidify the well know idea that main stream media in not genuine in its support for those who are real people and real victims. Instead, as Marshall indicated, leftist journalists are more concerned about abstract victims that fall into the media narrative.

Although this has not been reported on any main stream media outlets, Leslie Marshall’s response caused many citizens on twitter to become outraged and responded to her with their own posts.

 

One twitter account, @Kyle Tsmart wrote “Trolling the VP at this time? Classy Another Twitter poster by the name of Dan Crispen posted “What’s gotten into you? Your response is shameful.”

Sunday, 04 June 2017 00:23

London Bridge Terror Attack

 

London Bridge Under Attack!

Two Other Attacks Have Occured

Posted by Jake Fogg June 3, 2017 
 

In London, what appears to be series of terror attacks that resulted in multiple casualties, occurred on the London Bridge beginning at approximately 10:30pm.  Police have rushed to an incident after witnesses said a van drove into pedestrians, according to a news report by Reuters.

The London Bridge is completely closed according to one witness, a French banker living in the city, with “police cars going one way and ambulances going the other”.

British Police told the BBC that casualties have been identified after what may have been an attack by a van and stabbings.

The police rushed to the scene after witnesses told them a van ran over pedestrians Saturday night. A woman told Rueters she saw people that looked to have had their throats cut.

According to Police, armed officers were also dealing with an incident in the Borough Market area nearby.

A woman told the BBC News, that “A white van driver came speeding – probably about 50mph- veered off the road into the crowds of people who were walking along the pavement.”

Another witness told Reuters that she saw what she thought was three people with people with knife wounds that possibly included trauma to the throat as if they had been cut.

Several witnesses have reported hearing gunshots, but it is unclear, at this point from whom or where the gunshots originated.

A third incident which police are dealing was reported in the Vauxhall area at around midnight.

This attacks, which police are not yet reporting as a terrorist attack, comes only 12 days following the Manchester suicide bombing that killed 22 people at a concert and only 3 months after a terrorist ran pedestrians over on Westminster Bridge and stabbed and killed a police officer.

With the June 8 election only 5 days away, it is unclear if this attack with have an impact on the Conservative Party’s  lead in the polls.

 

 

Saturday, 03 June 2017 05:25

Trump's Changes Climate!

Trump's Climate Decision Has Immediate Impact on Environment!
U.S. Political Climate Upset

June 2, 2017

By: Jake Fogg

Yesterday, much to the dismay of many high-ranking leftists, President Donald Trump announced that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accord.  The accord, which is actually a treaty, but only called an “agreement”, was entered into against Constitutional requirements by former  President Barack Obama in 2015 with enforcement beginning  late last year.

 Shortly after the announcement, the governors of three states formed a union devoted to what the Paris Treaty was loosely alleged to accomplish, which was apparently the reduction of greenhouse gasses.

In addition to the governors’ “climate alliance”, several media sources, and government officials in the U.S. and even other countries  began reportring “news”  and emotion-filled comentary that showed one-sidedness in response to The President’s decision. None of these reports seemed to support the Trump agenda,  which is to benefit “ Americans first”.

While there was much disatisfaction expressed, very little was mentioned of actual  legalities of the issue to begin with including the hampered freedoms of U.S. citizens as wellthe fact that it was unconstitutional for the former president to enter into this treaty in the first place.

The three governors who committed to the so-called “climate alliance” were Jerry Brown of California, Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Jay Inslee of Washington state, according to the Time.com.   The small group of three claim that they are “committed to upholding the Paris Climate(Treaty) Agreement and taking aggressive action on climate change”.

In a press release, Governor Jerry Brown accused President Trump of being “AWOL on this profoundly human endeavor” and said that other states would “step up”. The California governor also called Trump’s decision an “insane move” and “deviant behavior from the highest office of the land”.

Brown failed to admit that the “behavior” of the Obama administration was also devious in that it intentionally sought to circumvent congress in the whole process. as he also omitted just how much of California tax payer money he would commit from his deeply-indebted state.

According to Rollcall.com, Andrew Cuomo also weighed in on the commitment to the Paris Treaty by saying that he would issue an executive order that supports the state’s commitment to environmental concerns.  He, like Brown forgot to mention just how much the tax payers of New York would be required to pay.

Yesterday, following the president’s speech, the Washington Post released an article claiming to “fact-check” the president’s comments during the speech.  However, the article written by Glenn Kessler and Michelle Ye Hee Lee, contained very little actual supporting data and mostly axiomatic statements thus furthering its overt commitment to supporting the anti-Trump narrative.

Another article released by the Washington post earlier today and written by John Wagner is an opinion piece under the heading “politics”.  The purpose of this article is to show that Trump only pulled out of Paris treaty to support his voter base by fulfilling his promise to them.  Wagner points out that Trump, “remains historically unpopular at this point in his presidency”, but fails to explain that the voter base support itself remains largely unchanged since his election.

Wagner also attempts to marginalize the base by pointing out only a certain segment of it, which could be stereotyped as “unintelligent”.  An example of this is evident when he writes, “Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris accord plays particularly well with rural backers who embraced his ‘America First’ mantra” and are wary of the impact of Obama-era deals cut with allies overseas.”

Other sources in the news were not as subtle, however.  In a show segment of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” commentator, Joe Scarborough became emotional over the news of the withdraw. After implying that White House advisor, Steve Bannon told the president to withdraw from the Paris treaty, he then made the statement ,”Trump doesn’t know anything”.

Following this, Scarborough went on an emotional rant, almost yelling, referencing “President Bannon” several times.  He also claimed that “President Bannon” was only obsessing with a “small subset of the population”, inaccurately referring to the Trump voter base, presumably. However, he referred to “President Bannon” instead of Trump, so many times that it was possible the Scarborough might have been confused from an audience perspective.

But not only is the media showing its disdain for Trump’s decision yesterday, several countries that are part of the agreement, are also unhappy with President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Treaty.

According to a report today by the BBC, German Chancellor, Angela Merkel said the move was “extremely regrettable” but nothing would stop the treaty from moving forward.  “We need the Paris agreement to protect all of creation,” she said.

The European Commission and the UN essentially stated that the “agreement” was unstoppable. Several other countries in the accord expressed dissatisfaction with the President’s decision. 

In this anti-Trump political climate, it is obvious that there is no support whatsoever for the president. However, regardless of media and outsider feedback, the president is doing exactly what an elected official is expected to do, support his constituents and carry out campaign promises. This idea is foreign to many in today’s political ranks and serves to promote a valuable lesson to those willing to learn from it. 

Wednesday, 31 May 2017 17:27

UK Teachers teach LBGT

UK Teachers Demand to Teach Toddlers  “LGBT Lifestyles”

By: Jake Fogg

At a national conference in Cardiff, Wales, UK’s National Union of Teachers (NUT) voted for its members to teach LBGT lifestyles and issues to toddlers in preschools and nursery schools.

While this may be a surprise to many, this issue is not only in the UK, but also in other parts of Europe and in the United States that has been working its way to younger and younger minds.  

One example of this occurred in March of 2010 when the World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts held a no-adults-welcome panel at the United Nations in which Planned Parenthood handed out brochures titled “Healthy, Happy, and Hot”. 

According to the association, the publication was distributed to girls as young as 10 years of age.  It covered such topics as masturbation, casual sex, and even “talking dirty”.  In the U.S., the organization is called Girl Scouts of the USA and claimed no connection to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, where the panel took place.

National Union of Teachers (NUT) stated that transgender lifestyles and same-sex relationships should be ‘promoted’ to children as young as two to reduce hate crime. An excerpt from the NUT Conference Final Agenda confirmed the statement in the wording, “…including promotion of LBGT+ matters for all school from Nursery throughout all phases of state education;”

NUT teachers complain that there is a “lack of policies which promote LGBT issues within schools”.  The teachers  at the conference agree that this has a “significant negative impact on the well-being of students and teachers who are homosexual, bisexual, or transgender.”

Much of the NUT Final Agenda was dedicated to ensuring that teachers were not required to carry an exceeded workload and seemed to complain about academic requirements being too strenuous. Yet, the organization encouraged its teachers to do extra to ensure LGBT standards were carried out even though the government had not yet made the standards mandatory for primary-aged students. 

The conference made two points very clear.  

SOCIAL MEDIA

hubiconfacebook

News Letter

Subscribe our Email News Letter to get Instant Update at anytime